Strategy Submission
Using QSEN Competencies during a Tornado Disaster Simulation
Author:
Georgine Berent
ED, RN-BC, ACRN
Title:
Associate Professor
Coauthors:
Cheryl Smith, MSN, RN & Kenneth Burns, PhD, RN
Institution:
MacMurray College
Email:
Competency Categories:
Patient-Centered Care, Safety
Learner Level(s):
Continuing Education, Pre-Licensure BSN, RN to BSN
Learner Setting(s):
Skills or Simulation Laboratories
Strategy Type:
General Strategy
Learning Objectives:
Strategy Overview:
Simulation: Level 4 tornado touched down at a K- 8 school hitting the lunchroom. Debris and victims are scattered about the area. Some victims are crying; some are selectively mute; some are injured. Nursing students along with social work and psychology students must complete triage and minimize the psychological trauma. (Homeland security and criminal justice students can participate in this simulation: Homeland Security: Set up a command post or Emergency Operations Center – EOC; responsible for information sharing, resource allocations, and the smooth delivery of effective service; Criminal Justice: Secure the area; screen all persons entering examining ID badges—remember, this is a disaster area and only qualified responders are allowed in area. Keep parents, concerned citizens, the press, and others outside the triage area.)
Submitted Materials:
Additional Materials:
Evaluation Description:
Describe evaluation methods and your assessments (anecdotal or data-based) of learning outcomes and student/faculty satisfaction with this strategy.
Please answer the following:
1. The purpose of the Level 4 Tornado Simulation was clear and understandable.
A. Strongly disagree
B. Disagree
C. Agree
D. Strongly agree
2. The team communicated effectively with the victims.
A. Strongly disagree
B. Disagree
C. Agree
D. Strongly agree
3. The teams communicated effectively between each other.
A. Strongly disagree
B. Disagree
C. Agree
D. Strongly agree
4. The actions during the simulation were patient focused.
A. Strongly disagree
B. Disagree
C. Agree
D. Strongly agree
5. Interventions made by teams were appropriate.
A. Strongly disagree
B. Disagree
C. Agree
D. Strongly agree
6. The content was appropriate supporting the objectives.
A. Strongly disagree
B. Disagree
C. Agree
D. Strongly agree
7. The teaching method was effective for the subject matter.
A. Strongly disagree
B. Disagree
C. Agree
D. Strongly agree
8. The content added to my knowledge.
A. Strongly disagree
B. Disagree
C. Agree
D. Strongly agree
9. The speakers were effective presenters.
A. Strongly disagree
B. Disagree
C. Agree
D. Strongly agree
10. This information will affect my professional practice.
A. Strongly disagree
B. Disagree
C. Agree
D. Strongly agree